Ontario opens new front in trade war by targeting electricity
John Woodside,
Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Power grids are the new front in the unfolding trade war with the United States, but Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s decision to use electricity as leverage carries major risks worth considering.
On Thursday, Ford said Ontario will charge 25 per cent more for electricity shipped to 1.5 million Americans across Minnesota, New York and Michigan starting Monday in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs. The premier has also threatened to shut off power completely to the three U.S. states by early April if the tariffs remain.
“You touch the stove once, you get burned, you don’t touch that stove again,” Ford said. “We’re going to make sure that we follow through with what we said we were going to do.”
Larry Hughes, an energy system expert and professor at Dalhousie University, told Canada’s National Observer that cutting the U.S. off from electricity carries significant downsides that must be weighed if that option is seriously being considered. A policy directive under former President Barack Obama, states the United States considers electricity (and energy broadly) an “enabling function” of critical infrastructure. That characterization means energy is deemed a “uniquely critical” component for the functioning of the economy.
For now, “Ford has backed off turning off the electricity,” Hughes said. “Adding a surcharge is not the same. We’ll have to see how much this annoys the Americans.”
“If we start turning off energy supplies … I think that would give the Americans an excuse to be even more belligerent,” Hughes said, adding it could be considered “an attack on their critical infrastructure.”
Beyond critical infrastructure, it’s a significant shot across the bow of the American economy to make electricity more expensive for states importing from Canada. Affordable electricity is a key input for industrial and manufacturing businesses, and rate hikes hit American pocketbooks.
Canada exports more electricity into the U.S. than it imports, but in recent years, the gap is closing, suggesting there is limited leverage in using electricity exports as a tool to force Trump to back down from his tariff war.
From 2020 to 2024, Canada’s electricity exports to the U.S. have fallen about 46 per cent. At the same time, Canada’s imports over that same period have grown roughly 142 per cent.
Even though in recent years Canada has exported less and imported more, the country is still fetching increasingly more cash for its electrons. In 2024, the value of Canadian electricity exports was worth $3.1 billion up from $2.5 billion in 2020 thanks to higher prices per megawatt hour.
But Canada is spending much more on imports, too. In 2020, Canada imported $286-million worth of electricity, compared to $1.3 billion in 2024.
“Electricity exchanges across the United States and Canada — historically each other’s largest electricity trading partners — remain relatively small, representing less than one per cent of their respective total generation,” reports the U.S. Energy Information Administration. “However, the trade is important to grid balancing — constantly matching electricity consumption to electricity production — and helping to shore up electricity supply during low hydropower production periods particularly on the western coast of Canada.”
Hughes said if Canadian provinces began cutting the U.S. off from electricity, the U.S. could turn around and do the same. And that could harm certain regions.
Canada does not have an East-West power grid connecting the country, or even robust power grids effectively connecting regions within the country. Instead, Canada relies on North-South connections with the U.S. States on the border. In a crisis, many Canadian provinces would be unable to help one another. Due to droughts that are becoming more intense and frequent because of climate change, hydro reservoirs have less generating capacity, and as a result, last year both British Columbia and Manitoba (two provinces with significant hydro resources) had to import electricity from the U.S. to help meet demand.
Nova Scotia is also a good example of the interconnectedness between the two countries. The maritime province is phasing out its coal power plants by 2030 to meet federal requirements, and aims to add more wind, battery storage, and hydro power from Muskrat Falls to do that. In the meantime, however, it is using gas to balance the grid, and it gets its gas from the U.S via a pipeline through New Brunswick.
“Our electricity system in Nova Scotia won’t work if the natural gas is cut off,” Hughes said. “We need natural gas in Nova Scotia, and if it was to be cut off, we’d be in trouble.”
The risk of some provinces using electricity exports as leverage could put vulnerable provinces that had nothing to do with the decision in the cross-hairs of American retaliation.
Energy and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said in a statement that the goal of Canada’s retaliatory tariffs is to pressure Americans by focusing the government’s response on American goods that are sold in large quantities.
“In terms of other measures, we haven’t taken anything off the table, and provincial and territorial governments are free to add additional measures,” Wilkinson said. “This is an evolving conversation, but that’s not to say that we will not be looking to do more. There are other tools in our toolbox, including energy and critical minerals, that may become part of this conversation down the road.
“To be clear, though — we don’t want that,” he said. “At the end of the day, we want to see the tariffs lifted.”
The trade blows between two long time allies this week have been chaotic. On Tuesday, Trump imposed 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods and a 10 per cent levy on energy (a spokesperson for Wilkinson’s office said the Trump administration has not clarified which rate applies to electricity). Canada responded with 25 per cent retaliatory tariffs on $30-billion worth of American products and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said tariffs on another $125 billion in goods would follow after three weeks.
Then, Trump announced a month-long reprieve for the auto sector on Wednesday, and on Thursday paused tariffs on goods considered compliant with the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement until April 2.
Both Ford and Trudeau have said they will not back down from retaliatory measures until all tariffs are removed.
“We have to follow through until he drops tariffs completely,” Ford said.
John Woodside,
Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Canada’s National Observer